Return to my home page
Me Humour Links Pics Articles Feedback Updates Map Info Fun Search

- Fun with Maths: Answers -

1089 GUARANTEED!

When you reverse the digits in a number, you can consider this to be the same as multiplying by 99 (100 - 1) for the difference between the end two digits. Algebraically, this can be expressed as:

where A, B and C are the digits in your number.
Expanding and simplifying this gives us:

It can be easily seen that the 10B term cancels itself out, hence the middle digit of the number you first thought of is irrelevant!
Your answer will be a three digit number, the first of which can legitimately be zero. Since A must be greater than C, and both must be between 0 and 9 inclusive, the ONLY possible results to the subtraction are:

Note that the middle digit is always 9, and that the first and last digits add up to 9. These are the first 9 terms of the 99 times table!
Therefore let's call our answer 100X + 90 + (9 - X).
The algebraic expression for the reverse of that number is given by

Adding these two values together gives us:

which simplifies to (100X + 90 + 9 - X) + (900 - 100X + 90 + X).
The 100X and X terms cancel each other out, leaving us with:

Return to Fun with Maths indexFun with Maths

Return to my home pageHome

Return to Articles base pageArticles

Site MapMap


TRY THE CHOCOLATE MATHS GAME

This one works by effectively taking the number of times you'd like to have chocolate a week, multiplying it by 100, adding in the current year, then subtracting the year of your birth. But it's done in a fairly obfuscated manner so you're not aware of what's going on until you work the maths out.

  1. Let's call the number of times you'd like to have chocolate "x".
  2. Multiplying by 2 gives you 2x.
  3. Adding 5 gives you 2x + 5.
  4. Multiplying by 50 gives us 50(2x + 5) which simplifies to 100x + 250.
    Now you can see where the 100 times the number you first thought of gets there!
  5. Add 1750. Adding 1750 to 250 give you 2000. When this first came out it would only work in the year 2000. This is the reason why that was so.
    The 100x term remains unaltered by this step.
  6. You need to subtract one if you have not yet had your brithday, because otherwise you may come out as being a year older than you are if you perform this calculation before your birthday in any given year.
  7. Add 1 for every year since 2000 - necessary to make it work beyond 2000.
    After this step you now have the current year (less 1 if you have not yet had your birthday) + 100x.
  8. Subtracting the year of your birth from the current year gives you your age. Adding this to 100x gives you the first digit as the number you first thought of, followed by your age.

Obvious when you know how, isn't it?

Return to Fun with Maths indexFun with Maths

Return to my home pageHome

Return to Articles base pageArticles

Site MapMap


TRY YOUR BRAIN AT SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS
  1. TWO-VARIABLE PROBLEM: SOLUTION
    Let the distance between his home and his mother's place be called A.
    Let the distance between his home and place of work be B.
    We know that A + B is 120: the distance between his mother's house and his place of work.
    The distance to work and back for a week is given by 2 * 5 * B.
    The distance to his mother's and back is given by 2 * A.
    We are told that these two distances are the same, so 2 * 5 * B = 2 * A.
    This simplifies to 5B = A.
    We now have 2 options to get the same answer, namely the Elimination method or the Substitution method.

    Elimination method:
    Re-arrange 5B = A to be 5B - A = 0.
    Add (5B - A = 0) to (A + B = 120) and we get (5B - A) + (A + B) = 120 - 0.
    Notice that A is eliminated in the subtraction so we get 6B = 120.
    Hence B (the distance to work each day) is 20 miles.

    Substitution Method:
    We have A on its own in the equation 5B = A.
    Substitute into A + B = 120, and we get (5B) + B = 120, or 6B = 120.
    Hence B (the distance to work each day) is 20 miles.

  2. SIX-VARIABLE PROBLEM: SOLUTION
    Ok, 6 simultaneous equations. This should be fun (not!)
    Let's try to keep it simple, shall we? (Suggested answer: Yes)
    Let's use letters to avoid repeating everyone's names:

    Now let's convert the prose into algebra...

    Let's start by eliminating the age of the mother by equating (a) and (c):

    Now let's get rid of the age of the father by equating (b) and (g):

    Now modify (f) to get rid of F (= B + C) and M (= A + D) in one go:

    We want to ignore any equations for now that reference M or F. Thus the only equations we want to use now are (d), (e), (h) and (i). Using these equations let's get rid of A:

    While we're at it let's get rid of any reference to B, ensuring that no reference to A creeps back in:

    Now change (i) to get rid of the references to A and B:

    Now (k) and (l) are two simple simultaneous equations involving only two variables. It gets easy now, honest.
    It's now a simple matter of plugging values back into the original or derived equations in order to solve the problem. It all unfolds itself very quickly now.

Return to Fun with Maths indexFun with Maths

Return to my home pageHome

Return to Articles base pageArticles

Site MapMap


NEXT NUMBER IN THE SEQUENCE

OK, we start with one: 1
that's one one: 11
that's two ones: 21
which is one two, one one: 1211
that's one one, one two, two ones: 111221
or three ones, two twos, one one: 312211
which gives us one three, one one, two twos, two ones: 13112221
after which comes one one, one three, two ones, three twos, one one: 1113213211

Easy when you know how, isn't it?

Return to Fun with Maths indexFun with Maths

Return to my home pageHome

Return to Articles base pageArticles

Site MapMap